As the US Senate launches the first impeachment trial of a US president in the 21st centuryand only the third in the history of the countryDonald Trumps defense team has offered new hints about how they plan to block the Democrats case that the president abused the power of his office. They plan to argue that national security prevents a full airing of the evidence.
The tell-tale phrase appears all over the presidents defense and the governments response to the impeachment charges. As Axioss Jonathan Swan and Alayna Treene reported over the weekend, Trump officials say they feel especially bullish about one key argument against calling additional impeachment witnesses: It could compromise America’s national security.
Trumps lawyers and Senate Republicans have similarly underscored that argument by pushing for any testimony from White House national security advisor John Bolton occurs in a closed, classified settingensuring that his words are never directly seen by the public at home. Anonymous administration officials told the Washington Post that national security concerns would justify such a move. Similarly, House impeachment manager Adam Schiff, who also chairs the House Intelligence Committee, has made public a long-standing conflict with the National Security Agency, which he accused of inappropriately withholding documents and intercepts that would comprise critical impeachment inquiry evidence.
Its not hard to see why the presidents defenders are leaning so heavily on the national security MacGuffin: That constitutional duty to keep the country safe is a realm where US presidents have always had unique authority and discretion. Congress and the courts both often defer to the executive branch on such questions and have traditionally provided wide latitude to the White House to determine what is worthy of protection when it comes to national security secrets.
For scholars of presidential history, Trumps playbook and argument about leaning on national security concerns may also seem all too familiar. Its precisely how Richard Nixon tried to stonewall the Watergate investigation and prevent his now-infamous Oval Office tapes from ever being released.
Trumps cry-wolf strategy seems just as likely to be misdirection as Nixons defense was.
Trumps lawyers are arguing that any attempt by the House impeachment managers and Senate Democrats to force additional testimony by witnessesparticularly people like Boltonwould likely compromise the presidents ability to do his job day-to-day protecting the country. In fact, in outlining their defense of the president, Trumps team directly cites Nixons defense from the 1970s, explaining that in US v. Nixon, the Supreme Court wrote that courts have traditionally shown the utmost deference to Presidential responsibilities for foreign policy and national security.
Of course, what Trumps lawyers fail to note is that Nixons claims surrounding national security fell apart as his own impeachment unfolded.
The smoking gun tape of Nixons conversation on June 23, 1972 with White House chief of staff H.R. Haldemanthe tape that Nixon fought longest and hardest to prevent releasing, and whose ultimate disclosure in July 1974 precipitated the collapse of his political support and his resignationreveals Nixons first instincts about how to get the FBI to shut down its investigation of the Watergate break-in: Tell them it involves the CIA and the whole matter is a national security concern. Unfortunately for Nixon, the CIA was unwilling to play ball in the cover-up, and the FBI was already following too many leads.
While Nixon and his allies failed at that initial attempt to button up the scandal, they spent the next two years arguing in one forum or another that national security concerns prevented a full and complete investigation.
As investigators zeroed in on the Oval Office tapes, Nixons lawyer Charles Wright told judge John Sirica that one of the tapes investigators wanted could never be released without doing grave harm to the country. There is national-security material so highly sensitive that [President Nixon] does not feel free even to hint to me what the nature of it is, Wright told the judge.